Jurassic World website logo

Argentinosaurus or Puertasaurus?

Puertasaurus
Rank: CompsognathusXP: 03,929 Views

Why did they not take the opportunity to have some of the real giants in the movie? The Argentinosaurs or Puertasaurs would be visually impressive. Do you think they are saving the for sequels?  The IMAX doccumenteray Giants of Pategonia with a much lower budget and CGI effects provided some stunning sequences with the Argentinosaurus. It really is staggering that something that larged roamed around on land. Puertasaurus is even heavier.

2 Replies

User Avatar
Primal King
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

I think they used Apatosaurus because it's a graceful, yet still large sauropod. As cool as Argentinosaurus and Puertasaurus are, they don't have the majesty or grace that Apatosaurus has. It's too bulky.

"If you can't see it... It's already too late."

-Jurassic Apocalypse (by Paden)

User Avatar
NateZilla10000
Group: Member
Rank: Compsognathus
View Profile

If done correctly, Argentinosaurus would be a spectacle because of sheer size. Imagine the Brachiosaurus scene in the first movie but using an animal that's even BIGGER. That would be something to see.

 

I do hope they expand their horizons in future films with actual dinosaur species instead of genetic hybrids (like, cross-species wise). It's more fun to see animals in the JP franchise; leave the monsters to the monster movies.

Add Your Reply


Guests can only post text. Please sign in to add links, images, etc...
Scified Editor Logo

Other discussions started by Puertasaurus

Join the discussion!
Please sign in to access your profile features!
(Signing in also removes ads!)



Forgot Password?
Jurassic World fansite logoJurassic World fansite
Explore All Our Communities
AlienFansite
PredatorFansite
AvPFansite
GodzillaFansite
Network