Why did they not take the opportunity to have some of the real giants in the movie? The Argentinosaurs or Puertasaurs would be visually impressive. Do you think they are saving the for sequels? The IMAX doccumenteray Giants of Pategonia with a much lower budget and CGI effects provided some stunning sequences with the Argentinosaurus. It really is staggering that something that larged roamed around on land. Puertasaurus is even heavier.
Share this topic:
Primal King Group: Member Rank: Compsognathus View Profile
I think they used Apatosaurus because it's a graceful, yet still large sauropod. As cool as Argentinosaurus and Puertasaurus are, they don't have the majesty or grace that Apatosaurus has. It's too bulky.
"If you can't see it... It's already too late."
-Jurassic Apocalypse (by Paden)
NateZilla10000 Group: Member Rank: Compsognathus View Profile
If done correctly, Argentinosaurus would be a spectacle because of sheer size. Imagine the Brachiosaurus scene in the first movie but using an animal that's even BIGGER. That would be something to see.
I do hope they expand their horizons in future films with actual dinosaur species instead of genetic hybrids (like, cross-species wise). It's more fun to see animals in the JP franchise; leave the monsters to the monster movies.
Are you an avid Jurassic World fan looking for a dedicated online community of likeminded fans? Look no further! Create your own profile today and take part in our forums and gain XP points for all the content you post!
